Model Comparison

OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro vs Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Compare the listed model data for OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro by OpenAI and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic. Benchmark and pricing records are not a controlled test and may change.

Data last updated: 2026-10-16. Verify current model details with each provider.

What the listed data says

OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro: 128K tokens; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: 200K tokens. Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger listed context window. OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 93.5%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 88.7%; HumanEval: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 94.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 85.4%; SWE-bench Verified: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 68.4%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 49.0%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.

Catalog source links

Use these model and provider links to verify current specifications, pricing, and availability.

Computed differences from catalog data

  • The listed context windows are 128K tokens and 200K tokens; the larger is 1.56× the smaller.
  • On shared numeric benchmark entries, MMLU: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro − Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 = +4.8 percentage points (93.5% vs 88.7%); HumanEval: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro − Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 = +8.9 percentage points (94.3% vs 85.4%); SWE-bench Verified: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro − Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 = +19.4 percentage points (68.4% vs 49.0%).
  • The first listed parameter quantities are ~220B+ MoE (professional tier, exact size proprietary) and ~70B (balanced tier, exact size proprietary); the larger quantity is 3.14× the smaller. Total and active MoE parameters are not directly equivalent.
  • A release-date gap cannot be calculated from the catalog values (OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro: 2026; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: 2026).

Cost example: 1M input and 1M output tokens

Using only the catalog's listed per-million-token rates, 1M input plus 1M output tokens costs about $25 for OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro and $18 for Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6. This excludes provider-specific discounts, caching, and other fees.

Choose OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro if…

Choose OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Enterprise software engineering requiring complex multi-file project management, Advanced data analysis, financial modeling, and quantitative research, Multimodal business intelligence: combining documents, charts, and data, Legal and compliance document analysis at scale.

Choose Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 if…

Choose Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Everyday professional coding: code review, bug fixing, feature implementation, Business writing: reports, emails, proposals, and documentation at volume, Customer support automation requiring nuanced, accurate responses, Research summarization and information extraction from documents.

OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro

Browse OpenAI models

OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro — professional-grade reasoning and coding with extended context and enhanced accuracy.

Parameters: ~220B+ MoE (professional tier, exact size proprietary)

Context: 128K tokens

Catalog pricing: Via LITHOVEX AI free. OpenAI API: premium pricing.

OpenAI Coding · Reasoning · Vision · Multimodal · Agentic · Long Context

View OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro model profile

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Browse Anthropic models

Claude Sonnet 4.6 — Anthropic's fast, balanced model. High intelligence with low latency for everyday tasks and production use.

Parameters: ~70B (balanced tier, exact size proprietary)

Context: 200K tokens

Catalog pricing: Via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: mid-tier.

Anthropic Coding · Reasoning · Vision · Multimodal · Agentic · Long Context

View Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 model profile

Feature Comparison — OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro vs Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Catalog specifications for OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6
Specification OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6
Provider OpenAI Anthropic
Parameters ~220B+ MoE (professional tier, exact size proprietary) ~70B (balanced tier, exact size proprietary)
Context window 128K tokens 200K tokens
Maximum output Not listed Not listed
Catalog pricing Via LITHOVEX AI free. OpenAI API: premium pricing. Via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: mid-tier.
Listed input/output cost per 1M tokens input $5, output $20 per 1M tokens input $3, output $15 per 1M tokens
License Proprietary Proprietary
Coding support Listed Listed
Reasoning support Listed Listed
Vision input Listed Listed
Multimodal Listed Listed
Open weights No No
Benchmark: MMLU 93.5% 88.7%
Benchmark: HumanEval 94.3% 85.4%
Benchmark: SWE-bench Verified 68.4% 49.0%

Figures are transcribed from LITHOVEX model records. Benchmark versions and evaluation setups may differ; pricing and specifications can change. Check each provider's current documentation before making a decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is different between OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro: 128K tokens; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: 200K tokens. Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger listed context window. OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 93.5%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 88.7%; HumanEval: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 94.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 85.4%; SWE-bench Verified: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 68.4%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 49.0%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
What benchmark values are listed for OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
MMLU: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 93.5%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 88.7%; HumanEval: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 94.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 85.4%; SWE-bench Verified: OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro 68.4%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 49.0%. The catalog values may use different versions and evaluation setups, so they are reference points rather than a controlled head-to-head result.
Which model has the larger listed context window?
OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro: 128K tokens; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: 200K tokens. Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger listed context window.
What are the listed costs per million tokens for OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro: input $5, output $20 per 1M tokens (Via LITHOVEX AI free. OpenAI API: premium pricing.). Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: input $3, output $15 per 1M tokens (Via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: mid-tier.). Where separate numeric input and output rates are available, the worked example uses 1M input plus 1M output tokens. Confirm current terms with each provider.
How far apart are the listed release dates for OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
The catalog lists OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro as 2026 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 as 2026; a release-date gap cannot be calculated from both records.
When was the comparison data last updated?
The model catalog records 2026-10-16 as its data update date. Provider specifications and prices may have changed since then.
How should I choose between OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Compare the listed specifications and capabilities, review the benchmark notes, then test both with the same representative prompt for your task. This page does not claim a universal winner.

Still deciding? Try both free — no commitment.

Create your free LITHOVEX account and compare OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 on your actual tasks. No credit card, no API key, no subscriptions needed.