Model Comparison

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 vs Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Compare the listed model data for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 by Anthropic and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic. Benchmark and pricing records are not a controlled test and may change.

Data last updated: 2026-10-16. Verify current model details with each provider.

What the listed data says

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8: 200K tokens; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: 200K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 92.1%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 88.7%; HumanEval: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 90.5%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 85.4%; GPQA: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 74.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 65.2%; SWE-bench Verified: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 62.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 49.0%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.

Catalog source links

Use these model and provider links to verify current specifications, pricing, and availability.

Computed differences from catalog data

  • The listed context windows are 200K tokens and 200K tokens; the larger is 1× the smaller.
  • On shared numeric benchmark entries, MMLU: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 − Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 = +3.4 percentage points (92.1% vs 88.7%); HumanEval: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 − Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 = +5.1 percentage points (90.5% vs 85.4%); GPQA: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 − Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 = +9.1 percentage points (74.3% vs 65.2%); SWE-bench Verified: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 − Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 = +13.3 percentage points (62.3% vs 49.0%).
  • The first listed parameter quantities are ~200B+ (frontier MoE, exact size proprietary) and ~70B (balanced tier, exact size proprietary); the larger quantity is 2.86× the smaller. Total and active MoE parameters are not directly equivalent.
  • A release-date gap cannot be calculated from the catalog values (Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8: 2026; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: 2026).

Cost example: 1M input and 1M output tokens

Using only the catalog's listed per-million-token rates, 1M input plus 1M output tokens costs about $36 for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and $18 for Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6. This excludes provider-specific discounts, caching, and other fees.

Choose Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 if…

Choose Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Complex enterprise analysis requiring maximum accuracy: financial modeling, legal review, scientific research, Long-document processing: contracts, research papers, technical specifications up to 200K tokens, Agentic software engineering: autonomous multi-file codebase changes and complex debugging, Graduate-level academic and scientific reasoning requiring deep domain knowledge.

Choose Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 if…

Choose Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Everyday professional coding: code review, bug fixing, feature implementation, Business writing: reports, emails, proposals, and documentation at volume, Customer support automation requiring nuanced, accurate responses, Research summarization and information extraction from documents.

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8

Browse Anthropic models

Anthropic's most powerful model ever. Deeper reasoning, stronger agentic coding, superior design sense, and sharper analytical precision than Opus 4.7.

Parameters: ~200B+ (frontier MoE, exact size proprietary)

Context: 200K tokens

Catalog pricing: Access via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: high-tier pricing.

Anthropic Coding · Reasoning · Vision · Multimodal · Agentic · Long Context

View Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 model profile

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Browse Anthropic models

Claude Sonnet 4.6 — Anthropic's fast, balanced model. High intelligence with low latency for everyday tasks and production use.

Parameters: ~70B (balanced tier, exact size proprietary)

Context: 200K tokens

Catalog pricing: Via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: mid-tier.

Anthropic Coding · Reasoning · Vision · Multimodal · Agentic · Long Context

View Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 model profile

Feature Comparison — Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 vs Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Catalog specifications for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6
Specification Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6
Provider Anthropic Anthropic
Parameters ~200B+ (frontier MoE, exact size proprietary) ~70B (balanced tier, exact size proprietary)
Context window 200K tokens 200K tokens
Maximum output Not listed Not listed
Catalog pricing Access via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: high-tier pricing. Via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: mid-tier.
Listed input/output cost per 1M tokens input $6, output $30 per 1M tokens input $3, output $15 per 1M tokens
License Proprietary Proprietary
Coding support Listed Listed
Reasoning support Listed Listed
Vision input Listed Listed
Multimodal Listed Listed
Open weights No No
Benchmark: MMLU 92.1% 88.7%
Benchmark: HumanEval 90.5% 85.4%
Benchmark: GPQA 74.3% 65.2%
Benchmark: SWE-bench Verified 62.3% 49.0%

Figures are transcribed from LITHOVEX model records. Benchmark versions and evaluation setups may differ; pricing and specifications can change. Check each provider's current documentation before making a decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is different between Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8: 200K tokens; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: 200K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 92.1%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 88.7%; HumanEval: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 90.5%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 85.4%; GPQA: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 74.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 65.2%; SWE-bench Verified: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 62.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 49.0%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
What benchmark values are listed for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
MMLU: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 92.1%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 88.7%; HumanEval: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 90.5%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 85.4%; GPQA: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 74.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 65.2%; SWE-bench Verified: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 62.3%; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 49.0%. The catalog values may use different versions and evaluation setups, so they are reference points rather than a controlled head-to-head result.
Which model has the larger listed context window?
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8: 200K tokens; Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: 200K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal.
What are the listed costs per million tokens for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8: input $6, output $30 per 1M tokens (Access via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: high-tier pricing.). Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6: input $3, output $15 per 1M tokens (Via LITHOVEX AI free. Anthropic API: mid-tier.). Where separate numeric input and output rates are available, the worked example uses 1M input plus 1M output tokens. Confirm current terms with each provider.
How far apart are the listed release dates for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
The catalog lists Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 as 2026 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 as 2026; a release-date gap cannot be calculated from both records.
When was the comparison data last updated?
The model catalog records 2026-10-16 as its data update date. Provider specifications and prices may have changed since then.
How should I choose between Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Compare the listed specifications and capabilities, review the benchmark notes, then test both with the same representative prompt for your task. This page does not claim a universal winner.

Still deciding? Try both free — no commitment.

Create your free LITHOVEX account and compare Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 on your actual tasks. No credit card, no API key, no subscriptions needed.