Compare the listed model data for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic and Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) by Anthropic. Benchmark and pricing records are not a controlled test and may change.
Data last updated: 2026-10-16. Verify current model details with each provider.
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7: 200K tokens; Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro): 200K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) is listed for coding, reasoning, vision, multimodal input, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 91.6%; Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) 91.2%; HumanEval: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 89.2%; Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) 87.9%; GPQA: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 72.8%; Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) 71.4%; SWE-bench Verified: Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 58.4%; Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) 55.1%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
Use these model and provider links to verify current specifications, pricing, and availability.
Using only the catalog's listed per-million-token rates, 1M input plus 1M output tokens costs about $30 for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 and $90 for Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro). This excludes provider-specific discounts, caching, and other fees.
Choose Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Product design analysis, UI/UX critique, and aesthetic evaluation, Complex multi-step reasoning tasks in finance, law, and science, Agentic coding workflows requiring architectural decision-making, High-quality long-form writing combining technical accuracy with compelling narrative.
Choose Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Complex professional analysis requiring exceptional accuracy and nuance, Long-form report writing combining technical depth with readable structure, Multi-document research synthesis across legal, financial, or scientific domains, Agentic coding for complex software architecture decisions.
Excels in design, aesthetic quality, and nuanced reasoning. Perfect for agentic coding and complex long-running tasks.
Parameters: ~200B+ (frontier class, exact size proprietary)
Context: 200K tokens
Catalog pricing: Via LITHOVEX AI free.
Claude Opus 4.6 Pro — Anthropic's high-capability model for complex analysis, writing, and extended agentic coding tasks.
Parameters: ~200B+ (frontier class, exact size proprietary)
Context: 200K tokens
Catalog pricing: Via LITHOVEX AI free.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 | Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Parameters | ~200B+ (frontier class, exact size proprietary) | ~200B+ (frontier class, exact size proprietary) |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 200K tokens |
| Maximum output | Not listed | Not listed |
| Catalog pricing | Via LITHOVEX AI free. | Via LITHOVEX AI free. |
| Listed input/output cost per 1M tokens | input $5, output $25 per 1M tokens | input $15, output $75 per 1M tokens |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Coding support | Listed | Listed |
| Reasoning support | Listed | Listed |
| Vision input | Listed | Listed |
| Multimodal | Listed | Listed |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Benchmark: MMLU | 91.6% | 91.2% |
| Benchmark: HumanEval | 89.2% | 87.9% |
| Benchmark: GPQA | 72.8% | 71.4% |
| Benchmark: SWE-bench Verified | 58.4% | 55.1% |
Figures are transcribed from LITHOVEX model records. Benchmark versions and evaluation setups may differ; pricing and specifications can change. Check each provider's current documentation before making a decision.
Read the Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 model profile and Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 (Pro) model profile, or browse the model directory.