Model Comparison

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Codestral 22B v0.1

Compare the listed model data for Qwen3 Coder Next by Qwen and Codestral 22B v0.1 by mistralai. Benchmark and pricing records are not a controlled test and may change.

Data last updated: 2026-10-16. Verify current model details with each provider.

What the listed data says

Qwen3 Coder Next: 128K tokens; Codestral 22B v0.1: 32K tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger listed context window. Qwen3 Coder Next is listed for coding; Codestral 22B v0.1 is listed for coding, agentic workflows. Shared catalog benchmark entries: HumanEval: Qwen3 Coder Next 94.1%; Codestral 22B v0.1 81.1%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.

Catalog source links

Use these model and provider links to verify current specifications, pricing, and availability.

Computed differences from catalog data

  • The listed context windows are 128K tokens and 32K tokens; the larger is 4× the smaller.
  • On shared numeric benchmark entries, HumanEval: Qwen3 Coder Next − Codestral 22B v0.1 = +13 percentage points (94.1% vs 81.1%).
  • A release-date gap cannot be calculated from the catalog values (Qwen3 Coder Next: 2025; Codestral 22B v0.1: May 2024).

Cost example: 1M input and 1M output tokens

A cost example for 1M input plus 1M output tokens cannot be calculated reliably because separate numeric input and output rates are not listed for both models.

Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…

Choose Qwen3 Coder Next when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Frontier coding tasks requiring Qwen3 reasoning quality, Production software development assistance, Qwen3 generation coding model — combines Qwen3 intelligence with code specialization, Next-generation after Qwen2.5-Coder series.

Choose Codestral 22B v0.1 if…

Choose Codestral 22B v0.1 when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Professional software development in enterprises, IDE code completion with FIM, Cross-language polyglot workflows, SQL and data science generation.

Qwen3 Coder Next

Browse Qwen models

Next-gen Qwen Coder — agentic software engineering, repository-level code understanding, function calling, and autonomous bug fixing.

Parameters: Varies by variant

Context: 128K tokens

Catalog pricing: Apache 2.0 — free

Qwen Coding Open Source

View Qwen3 Coder Next model profile

Codestral 22B v0.1

Browse mistralai models

Mistral's flagship 22B code model — speaks 80+ languages, excellent at code generation, debugging, fill-in-the-middle, and tests.

Parameters: 22B

Context: 32K tokens

Catalog pricing: Non-Commercial free. Mistral API: €0.20/MTok input, €0.60/MTok output

mistralai Coding · Agentic

View Codestral 22B v0.1 model profile

Feature Comparison — Qwen3 Coder Next vs Codestral 22B v0.1

Catalog specifications for Qwen3 Coder Next and Codestral 22B v0.1
Specification Qwen3 Coder Next Codestral 22B v0.1
Provider Qwen mistralai
Parameters Varies by variant 22B
Context window 128K tokens 32K tokens
Maximum output Not listed Not listed
Catalog pricing Apache 2.0 — free Non-Commercial free. Mistral API: €0.20/MTok input, €0.60/MTok output
Listed input/output cost per 1M tokens input $0.07, output $0.15 per 1M tokens Separate numeric input/output rates not listed
License Apache 2.0 Codestral Non-Commercial License
Coding support Listed Listed
Reasoning support Not listed Not listed
Vision input Not listed Not listed
Multimodal Not listed Not listed
Open weights Yes No
Benchmark: HumanEval 94.1% 81.1%

Figures are transcribed from LITHOVEX model records. Benchmark versions and evaluation setups may differ; pricing and specifications can change. Check each provider's current documentation before making a decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is different between Qwen3 Coder Next and Codestral 22B v0.1?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 128K tokens; Codestral 22B v0.1: 32K tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger listed context window. Qwen3 Coder Next is listed for coding; Codestral 22B v0.1 is listed for coding, agentic workflows. Shared catalog benchmark entries: HumanEval: Qwen3 Coder Next 94.1%; Codestral 22B v0.1 81.1%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
What benchmark values are listed for Qwen3 Coder Next and Codestral 22B v0.1?
HumanEval: Qwen3 Coder Next 94.1%; Codestral 22B v0.1 81.1%. The catalog values may use different versions and evaluation setups, so they are reference points rather than a controlled head-to-head result.
Which model has the larger listed context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 128K tokens; Codestral 22B v0.1: 32K tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger listed context window.
What are the listed costs per million tokens for Qwen3 Coder Next and Codestral 22B v0.1?
Qwen3 Coder Next: input $0.07, output $0.15 per 1M tokens (Apache 2.0 — free). Codestral 22B v0.1: Separate numeric input/output rates not listed (Non-Commercial free. Mistral API: €0.20/MTok input, €0.60/MTok output). Where separate numeric input and output rates are available, the worked example uses 1M input plus 1M output tokens. Confirm current terms with each provider.
How far apart are the listed release dates for Qwen3 Coder Next and Codestral 22B v0.1?
The catalog lists Qwen3 Coder Next as 2025 and Codestral 22B v0.1 as May 2024; a release-date gap cannot be calculated from both records.
When was the comparison data last updated?
The model catalog records 2026-10-16 as its data update date. Provider specifications and prices may have changed since then.
How should I choose between Qwen3 Coder Next and Codestral 22B v0.1?
Compare the listed specifications and capabilities, review the benchmark notes, then test both with the same representative prompt for your task. This page does not claim a universal winner.

Still deciding? Try both free — no commitment.

Create your free LITHOVEX account and compare Qwen3 Coder Next and Codestral 22B v0.1 on your actual tasks. No credit card, no API key, no subscriptions needed.