Compare the listed model data for Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) by Qwen and GPT-OSS 120B by Microsoft / OpenAI. Benchmark and pricing records are not a controlled test and may change.
Data last updated: 2026-10-16. Verify current model details with each provider.
What the listed data says
Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE): 128K tokens; GPT-OSS 120B: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) is listed for coding, reasoning, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; GPT-OSS 120B is listed for coding, reasoning, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) 93.5%; GPT-OSS 120B 85.0%; HumanEval: Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) 96.2%; GPT-OSS 120B 88.0%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
Catalog source links
Use these model and provider links to verify current specifications, pricing, and availability.
The first listed parameter quantities are 235B total (22B active via MoE) and 120B; the larger quantity is 1.96× the smaller. Total and active MoE parameters are not directly equivalent.
A release-date gap cannot be calculated from the catalog values (Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE): April 2025; GPT-OSS 120B: 2025).
Cost example: 1M input and 1M output tokens
A cost example for 1M input plus 1M output tokens cannot be calculated reliably because separate numeric input and output rates are not listed for both models.
Choose Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) if…
Choose Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Frontier-level coding: production systems, open-source contributions, Leetcode hard, Competition mathematics, physics, and chemistry at graduate level, Enterprise AI applications requiring highest available open-model quality, Long-form technical writing: whitepapers, research papers, documentation.
Choose GPT-OSS 120B if…
Choose GPT-OSS 120B when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Enterprise AI requiring OpenAI quality in open-weight form, Researchers wanting full access to OpenAI-quality model weights, 120B open parameters from OpenAI — frontier quality with open weights, MIT license — fully free commercial use.
Feature Comparison — Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) vs GPT-OSS 120B
Catalog specifications for Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) and GPT-OSS 120B
Specification
Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE)
GPT-OSS 120B
Provider
Qwen
Microsoft / OpenAI
Parameters
235B total (22B active via MoE)
120B
Context window
128K tokens
128K tokens
Maximum output
Not listed
Not listed
Catalog pricing
Open source — free to self-host. Third-party API ~$0.30-0.80/MTok
MIT — free
Listed input/output cost per 1M tokens
Separate numeric input/output rates not listed
Separate numeric input/output rates not listed
License
Apache 2.0
MIT
Coding support
Listed
Listed
Reasoning support
Listed
Listed
Vision input
Not listed
Not listed
Multimodal
Not listed
Not listed
Open weights
Yes
Yes
Benchmark: MMLU
93.5%
85.0%
Benchmark: HumanEval
96.2%
88.0%
Figures are transcribed from LITHOVEX model records. Benchmark versions and evaluation setups may differ; pricing and specifications can change. Check each provider's current documentation before making a decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is different between Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) and GPT-OSS 120B?
Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE): 128K tokens; GPT-OSS 120B: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) is listed for coding, reasoning, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; GPT-OSS 120B is listed for coding, reasoning, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) 93.5%; GPT-OSS 120B 85.0%; HumanEval: Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) 96.2%; GPT-OSS 120B 88.0%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
What benchmark values are listed for Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) and GPT-OSS 120B?
MMLU: Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) 93.5%; GPT-OSS 120B 85.0%; HumanEval: Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) 96.2%; GPT-OSS 120B 88.0%. The catalog values may use different versions and evaluation setups, so they are reference points rather than a controlled head-to-head result.
Which model has the larger listed context window?
Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE): 128K tokens; GPT-OSS 120B: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal.
What are the listed costs per million tokens for Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) and GPT-OSS 120B?
Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE): Separate numeric input/output rates not listed (Open source — free to self-host. Third-party API ~$0.30-0.80/MTok). GPT-OSS 120B: Separate numeric input/output rates not listed (MIT — free). Where separate numeric input and output rates are available, the worked example uses 1M input plus 1M output tokens. Confirm current terms with each provider.
How far apart are the listed release dates for Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) and GPT-OSS 120B?
The catalog lists Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) as April 2025 and GPT-OSS 120B as 2025; a release-date gap cannot be calculated from both records.
When was the comparison data last updated?
The model catalog records 2026-10-16 as its data update date. Provider specifications and prices may have changed since then.
How should I choose between Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) and GPT-OSS 120B?
Compare the listed specifications and capabilities, review the benchmark notes, then test both with the same representative prompt for your task. This page does not claim a universal winner.
Create your free LITHOVEX account and compare Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE) and GPT-OSS 120B on your actual tasks. No credit card, no API key, no subscriptions needed.