Compare the listed model data for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct by Qwen and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct by Meta Llama. Benchmark and pricing records are not a controlled test and may change.
Data last updated: 2026-10-16. Verify current model details with each provider.
What the listed data says
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 128K tokens; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is listed for coding, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is listed for coding, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 86.2%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 83.6%; HumanEval: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 86.6%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 80.5%; MATH: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 83.1%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 68.0%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
Catalog source links
Use these model and provider links to verify current specifications, pricing, and availability.
The first listed parameter quantities are 72B and 70B; the larger quantity is 1.03× the smaller. Total and active MoE parameters are not directly equivalent.
The catalog release dates are September 2024 and July 2024, about 2 months apart at the precision supplied.
Cost example: 1M input and 1M output tokens
A cost example for 1M input plus 1M output tokens cannot be calculated reliably because separate numeric input and output rates are not listed for both models.
Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…
Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as General chat and Q&A, Multilingual applications, Document analysis, Coding assistance.
Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct if…
Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Legacy Llama 3.1 deployments, Organizations with established 3.1 toolchains, First Llama model with 128K context, Open weights.
Catalog specifications for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Specification
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Provider
Qwen
Meta Llama
Parameters
72B
70B
Context window
128K tokens
128K tokens
Maximum output
Not listed
Not listed
Catalog pricing
Free via LITHOVEX
Llama 3.1 Community License — free
Listed input/output cost per 1M tokens
input $0.6, output $1.2 per 1M tokens
Separate numeric input/output rates not listed
License
Qwen License
Meta Llama 3.1 Community License
Coding support
Listed
Listed
Reasoning support
Not listed
Not listed
Vision input
Not listed
Not listed
Multimodal
Not listed
Not listed
Open weights
Not listed
Yes
Benchmark: MMLU
86.2%
83.6%
Benchmark: HumanEval
86.6%
80.5%
Benchmark: MATH
83.1%
68.0%
Figures are transcribed from LITHOVEX model records. Benchmark versions and evaluation setups may differ; pricing and specifications can change. Check each provider's current documentation before making a decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is different between Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 128K tokens; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is listed for coding, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is listed for coding, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 86.2%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 83.6%; HumanEval: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 86.6%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 80.5%; MATH: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 83.1%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 68.0%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
What benchmark values are listed for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
MMLU: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 86.2%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 83.6%; HumanEval: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 86.6%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 80.5%; MATH: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 83.1%; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 68.0%. The catalog values may use different versions and evaluation setups, so they are reference points rather than a controlled head-to-head result.
Which model has the larger listed context window?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 128K tokens; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal.
What are the listed costs per million tokens for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: input $0.6, output $1.2 per 1M tokens (Free via LITHOVEX). Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: Separate numeric input/output rates not listed (Llama 3.1 Community License — free). Where separate numeric input and output rates are available, the worked example uses 1M input plus 1M output tokens. Confirm current terms with each provider.
How far apart are the listed release dates for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
The catalog lists Qwen2.5 72B Instruct as September 2024 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct as July 2024, about 2 months apart at the precision supplied.
When was the comparison data last updated?
The model catalog records 2026-10-16 as its data update date. Provider specifications and prices may have changed since then.
How should I choose between Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
Compare the listed specifications and capabilities, review the benchmark notes, then test both with the same representative prompt for your task. This page does not claim a universal winner.
Create your free LITHOVEX account and compare Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on your actual tasks. No credit card, no API key, no subscriptions needed.