Compare the listed model data for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct by Meta Llama and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B by Nous Research. Benchmark and pricing records are not a controlled test and may change.
Data last updated: 2026-10-16. Verify current model details with each provider.
What the listed data says
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: 128K tokens; Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B: 8K tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has the larger listed context window. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is listed for no specific capability flags; Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B is listed for coding, agentic workflows. Shared catalog benchmark entries: HumanEval: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 72.6%; Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B 70.4%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
Catalog source links
Use these model and provider links to verify current specifications, pricing, and availability.
The listed context windows are 128K tokens and 8K tokens; the larger is 16× the smaller.
On shared numeric benchmark entries, HumanEval: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct − Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B = +2.2 percentage points (72.6% vs 70.4%).
The first listed parameter quantities are 8B and 8B; the larger quantity is 1× the smaller. Total and active MoE parameters are not directly equivalent.
The catalog release dates are July 2024 and June 2024, about 1 month apart at the precision supplied.
Cost example: 1M input and 1M output tokens
A cost example for 1M input plus 1M output tokens cannot be calculated reliably because separate numeric input and output rates are not listed for both models.
Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instruct if…
Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instruct when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Deployments requiring Llama 3.1 compatibility, Fine-tuning with existing Llama 3.1 8B fine-tunes, One of the most widely deployed open models globally, 128K context at 8B scale.
Choose Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B if…
Choose Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as AI agent frameworks requiring reliable function calling at 8B scale, Structured data extraction, API orchestration agents in production, Best function calling at 8B scale — purpose-tuned for reliable tool use and JSON output.
Feature Comparison — Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B
Catalog specifications for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B
Specification
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B
Provider
Meta Llama
Nous Research
Parameters
8B
8B
Context window
128K tokens
8K tokens
Maximum output
Not listed
Not listed
Catalog pricing
Free — Llama 3.1 Community License
MIT — free
Listed input/output cost per 1M tokens
Separate numeric input/output rates not listed
Separate numeric input/output rates not listed
License
Meta Llama 3.1 Community License
Llama 3 Community License / Nous Research License
Coding support
Not listed
Listed
Reasoning support
Not listed
Not listed
Vision input
Not listed
Not listed
Multimodal
Not listed
Not listed
Open weights
Yes
Yes
Benchmark: HumanEval
72.6%
70.4%
Figures are transcribed from LITHOVEX model records. Benchmark versions and evaluation setups may differ; pricing and specifications can change. Check each provider's current documentation before making a decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is different between Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: 128K tokens; Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B: 8K tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has the larger listed context window. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is listed for no specific capability flags; Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B is listed for coding, agentic workflows. Shared catalog benchmark entries: HumanEval: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 72.6%; Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B 70.4%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
What benchmark values are listed for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B?
HumanEval: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 72.6%; Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B 70.4%. The catalog values may use different versions and evaluation setups, so they are reference points rather than a controlled head-to-head result.
Which model has the larger listed context window?
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: 128K tokens; Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B: 8K tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has the larger listed context window.
What are the listed costs per million tokens for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: Separate numeric input/output rates not listed (Free — Llama 3.1 Community License). Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B: Separate numeric input/output rates not listed (MIT — free). Where separate numeric input and output rates are available, the worked example uses 1M input plus 1M output tokens. Confirm current terms with each provider.
How far apart are the listed release dates for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B?
The catalog lists Llama 3.1 8B Instruct as July 2024 and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B as June 2024, about 1 month apart at the precision supplied.
When was the comparison data last updated?
The model catalog records 2026-10-16 as its data update date. Provider specifications and prices may have changed since then.
How should I choose between Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B?
Compare the listed specifications and capabilities, review the benchmark notes, then test both with the same representative prompt for your task. This page does not claim a universal winner.
Create your free LITHOVEX account and compare Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hermes 2 Pro Llama3 8B on your actual tasks. No credit card, no API key, no subscriptions needed.