Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Compare the listed model data for DeepSeek-V3 by DeepSeek and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct by Meta Llama. Benchmark and pricing records are not a controlled test and may change.

Data last updated: 2026-10-16. Verify current model details with each provider.

What the listed data says

DeepSeek-V3: 128K tokens; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. DeepSeek-V3 is listed for coding, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is listed for coding, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: DeepSeek-V3 88.5%; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 86.0%; HumanEval: DeepSeek-V3 89.9%; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 88.4%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.

Computed differences from catalog data

  • The listed context windows are 128K tokens and 128K tokens; the larger is 1× the smaller.
  • On shared numeric benchmark entries, MMLU: DeepSeek-V3 − Llama 3.3 70B Instruct = +2.5 percentage points (88.5% vs 86.0%); HumanEval: DeepSeek-V3 − Llama 3.3 70B Instruct = +1.5 percentage points (89.9% vs 88.4%).
  • The first listed parameter quantities are 671B total (37B active via MoE) and 70B; the larger quantity is 9.59× the smaller. Total and active MoE parameters are not directly equivalent.
  • The catalog release dates are December 2024 and December 2024, about 0 months apart at the precision supplied.

Cost example: 1M input and 1M output tokens

A cost example for 1M input plus 1M output tokens cannot be calculated reliably because separate numeric input and output rates are not listed for both models.

Choose DeepSeek-V3 if…

Choose DeepSeek-V3 when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as General-purpose coding and software development, Business document analysis, API building at high quality and low cost, Enterprise AI integration at scale.

Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct if…

Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct when your task aligns with catalog-listed uses or strengths such as Enterprise text processing at 70B quality, Production chatbots for business, Code assistance, Best performance per dollar in the Llama 3.x family at 70B scale.

DeepSeek-V3

Browse DeepSeek models

DeepSeek flagship chat & code model — top-tier on coding benchmarks, long context tasks, and instruction following.

Parameters: 671B total (37B active via MoE)

Context: 128K tokens

Catalog pricing: MIT open source. DeepSeek API: $0.27/MTok input, $1.10/MTok output

DeepSeek Coding · Agentic · Long Context Open Source

View DeepSeek-V3 model profile

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Browse Meta Llama models

Latest Llama-3.3 70B — exceptional instruction following, coding, and multilingual capabilities across 8 languages.

Parameters: 70B

Context: 128K tokens

Catalog pricing: Llama 3.3 Community License — free. Third-party: $0.59-0.90/MTok

Meta Llama Coding · Agentic · Long Context Open Source

View Llama 3.3 70B Instruct model profile

Feature Comparison — DeepSeek-V3 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Catalog specifications for DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Specification DeepSeek-V3 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Provider DeepSeek Meta Llama
Parameters 671B total (37B active via MoE) 70B
Context window 128K tokens 128K tokens
Maximum output Not listed Not listed
Catalog pricing MIT open source. DeepSeek API: $0.27/MTok input, $1.10/MTok output Llama 3.3 Community License — free. Third-party: $0.59-0.90/MTok
Listed input/output cost per 1M tokens input $0.27, output $1.1 per 1M tokens Separate numeric input/output rates not listed
License MIT Meta Llama 3.3 Community License
Coding support Listed Listed
Reasoning support Not listed Not listed
Vision input Not listed Not listed
Multimodal Not listed Not listed
Open weights Yes Yes
Benchmark: MMLU 88.5% 86.0%
Benchmark: HumanEval 89.9% 88.4%

Figures are transcribed from LITHOVEX model records. Benchmark versions and evaluation setups may differ; pricing and specifications can change. Check each provider's current documentation before making a decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is different between DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
DeepSeek-V3: 128K tokens; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal. DeepSeek-V3 is listed for coding, agentic workflows, long-context tasks; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is listed for coding, agentic workflows, long-context tasks. Shared catalog benchmark entries: MMLU: DeepSeek-V3 88.5%; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 86.0%; HumanEval: DeepSeek-V3 89.9%; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 88.4%. These records are reference data, not a controlled head-to-head test; verify current pricing and specifications with each provider.
What benchmark values are listed for DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
MMLU: DeepSeek-V3 88.5%; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 86.0%; HumanEval: DeepSeek-V3 89.9%; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 88.4%. The catalog values may use different versions and evaluation setups, so they are reference points rather than a controlled head-to-head result.
Which model has the larger listed context window?
DeepSeek-V3: 128K tokens; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 128K tokens. The listed context-window values are equal.
What are the listed costs per million tokens for DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
DeepSeek-V3: input $0.27, output $1.1 per 1M tokens (MIT open source. DeepSeek API: $0.27/MTok input, $1.10/MTok output). Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Separate numeric input/output rates not listed (Llama 3.3 Community License — free. Third-party: $0.59-0.90/MTok). Where separate numeric input and output rates are available, the worked example uses 1M input plus 1M output tokens. Confirm current terms with each provider.
How far apart are the listed release dates for DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
The catalog lists DeepSeek-V3 as December 2024 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct as December 2024, about 0 months apart at the precision supplied.
When was the comparison data last updated?
The model catalog records 2026-10-16 as its data update date. Provider specifications and prices may have changed since then.
How should I choose between DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Compare the listed specifications and capabilities, review the benchmark notes, then test both with the same representative prompt for your task. This page does not claim a universal winner.

Still deciding? Try both free — no commitment.

Create your free LITHOVEX account and compare DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on your actual tasks. No credit card, no API key, no subscriptions needed.